We Removed the AI. Here's Why.

We Removed the AI. Here's Why.

I launched Calc618 with AI features that pulled news sentiment, analyzed community discussions, and generated technical reports. Last week, I stripped all of it out and relaunched with pure math only.

This isn't a story about AI being bad. It's about building what traders actually need versus what sounds impressive.

What the AI Actually Did

Let me be clear about what we had. The AI wasn't making predictions or generating signals. It was doing something more subtle, and that's exactly why I removed it.

You'd start by writing your trade idea and strategy. Then the AI would:

• Generate technical analysis based on OHLCV data
• Pull price action context from multiple sources
• Analyze news sentiment around the asset
• Check community sentiment across social platforms
• Create fundamental analysis summaries
• Show you "the other side of the trade" (counterarguments to your thesis)

Sounds helpful, right?

Here's the problem: it added a layer of noise between you and your decision.

The Moment I Knew

2am. Reading feedback. A trader wrote something that stuck with me:

"I calculated my risk. I knew my liquidation price. I had my plan. Then I checked the AI context, saw mixed sentiment, and hesitated. Missed my entry. The trade would've worked."

The AI didn't fail. It did exactly what I built it to do: gave context, showed data, synthesized information.

But it made the trader doubt his own math.

That's when I realized: I built a feature that undermined the entire point of the tool.

Why Context Overload Kills Confidence

In 14 years of trading (nostro desks, dealing rooms, managing multi-account portfolios), I've learned this:

More information doesn't always mean better decisions. Sometimes it just means more reasons to hesitate.

You can see every news headline. Every Reddit thread. Every sentiment indicator. Every technical pattern. And still lose money because you second-guessed the math that showed you the actual risk.

The AI context features were sophisticated. They pulled real data. They synthesized it intelligently. But they trained traders to seek external validation instead of trusting their own calculation.

When you know your liquidation price, your true cost after fees, and your breakeven target, you have what you need to decide. Everything else is just noise that makes you doubt the numbers.

The 90% Problem

There's a bigger issue here, and I see it across the entire AI SaaS industry.

Building AI features that work for 90% of use cases sounds great. But in trading, 90% isn't good enough. That missing 10% (the context the AI misses, the nuance it doesn't capture, the timing it can't predict) is where you lose money.

Generic AI solutions can't fully understand your specific trading style, your risk tolerance, your account size, your time horizon. So they give you "general" context that might be right, might be wrong, and definitely adds cognitive load.

I could have spent months fine-tuning the AI. Adding more data sources. Making it more "accurate." But accurate at what? Telling you what's already happening in the market?

You don't need AI to tell you Bitcoin is trending on Twitter. You need math to tell you where you get liquidated if the trend reverses.

What We're Left With (And Why It's Better)

Here's what Calc618 does now:

Pure calculation. Zero interpretation.

• Calculate position size for your risk tolerance
• Calculate max position based on account balance and risk limits
• Know your breakeven price after all costs
• Configure fees for any exchange (crypto or stocks)
• One-click TP/SL based on your strategy percentages
• Auto-load your default trade size for speed
• Calculate liquidation price when using leverage
• Import trades directly from exchanges
• Track emotional state with tags (fear, FOMO, discipline, revenge trading)
• Maintain notes on decision-making and execution
• Track real ROI

No sentiment analysis. No news aggregation. No counterarguments to your thesis.

Just the numbers that affect your P&L and the tools to build consistent discipline.

Why Math + Strategy Beat Context

Trading is brutal. Hours analyzing charts and data. Lonely decisions with real money on the line. High stakes where one mistake can wipe weeks of progress.

When I'm about to enter a trade, here's what I actually need:

1. How much am I willing to risk on this specific trade?
2. What size position keeps me within that risk?
3. How much can I gain if it works?
4. What are my total costs once I'm in?
5. What's my actual breakeven after those costs?

If I know those numbers, I can make the decision. News sentiment doesn't change my cost basis. Community vibes don't affect my breakeven. Technical analysis reports don't tell me how much to risk for how much I can gain.

The math is the truth. Everything else is commentary.

But here's what really matters: math wins over time, not on single trades.

You can have perfect context on one trade and still lose. You can miss the "best setup" and still make money that week. What separates traders who survive from traders who blow up isn't better analysis. It's consistent execution of a strategy.

When you know your numbers before every trade, track what you actually did versus what you planned, and maintain discipline through the emotional swings, that's when the edge compounds.

That's why we added features that support the full cycle:

Before the trade: Calculate your risk. Know your costs. Size your position properly. Set your TP and SL levels according to your strategy.

During the trade: Track your emotional state. Note what you're feeling when things move against you.

After the trade: Import the actual execution. Review your decision-making. Learn from what happened.

The calculator gives you the numbers. The journal gives you the discipline. Both together give you a strategy you can stick to when the market is moving fast and emotions run high.

What Changed

Removed:

• AI sentiment analysis (news, social, community)
• Technical analysis generation from OHLCV data
• Fundamental analysis summaries
• "See the other side of the trade" counterarguments
• Any feature that interpreted market conditions

Improved what already worked:

• Position sizing and max position calculations
• One-click TP/SL based on your strategy
• Default trade size for faster workflows
• Breakeven calculator (entry + all costs)
• Liquidation calculator (when using leverage)
• Trade journal and decision tracking
• Emotional state tagging

Added:

• US stocks support (not just crypto)
• Exchange import (pull actual trades)
• Faster calculations (no API calls or AI processing)
• Cleaner interface (no context panels or reports)

The Philosophy: Know Your Numbers, Make Your Call

I've liquidated accounts. I've held positions too long because "sentiment looked good." I've paid funding rates that ate my profit because I didn't calculate the cost of time.

Every expensive lesson taught me the same thing: the traders who survive are the ones who know their math.

Not the ones with the most context. Not the ones with the best sentiment tools. The ones who calculated their risk before clicking the button.

Calc618 exists because I wish I had this 14 years ago. A tool that shows me my liquidation price, my true costs, my actual breakeven, without trying to interpret the market for me.

The market doesn't care what AI thinks. It cares what the numbers say.

What This Means for You

If you used Calc618 before: The calculators you relied on are still here, just faster and cleaner. If you miss the context features, I get it. But I genuinely believe you'll make better decisions with less noise.

If you're new: Welcome to a tool that won't interpret the market for you. It'll show you your risk in exact numbers. You interpret. You decide.

If you're skeptical: Try it. Calculate your position size based on how much you're actually willing to lose. Import a week of trades and tag them honestly with your emotional state. See the patterns. Then tell me if you needed an AI report to build consistency.

Still Free. Still Independent. Still Transparent.

Nothing changes about the mission:

• Free to use. No premium tier unlocking "advanced AI."
• No exchange ownership. Not selling your data to anyone.
• Verifiable math. See the formulas. Check them yourself.
• No hidden agenda. Just calculations that protect you.

This is a calculator built by a solo trader who learned the hard way that math beats context every time.

No AI needed. No interpretation required. Just the numbers you need to trade with confidence.

Challenge: Build a Strategy, Not Just Take Trades

Before your next position:

1. Decide how much you're willing to risk
2. Decide how much you're aiming to gain
3. Calculate position size that keeps you within that risk
4. Set your TP and SL levels
5. Know your breakeven after all costs
6. Write down WHY you're taking this trade

During the trade:

1. Tag your emotional state
2. Note when you want to exit early (and whether you should)

After you close:

1. Import the trade
2. Review what you planned vs. what you executed
3. Look at your emotional patterns
4. Use that data for your next decision

Do that consistently and you're building a strategy that survives real market conditions.

Know your numbers. Track your psychology. Build discipline.

That's the tool. The rest is up to you.

Calc618: A crypto and stock trading calculator built by a solo trader with 14 years of experience. Calculate position sizes, costs, and risk. Import trades and track decisions. No AI interpretation. Just math and honest self-assessment.

Calculate before you trade →